<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does YAGNI Mean You Ignore The Obvious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skorks.com/2009/08/does-yagni-mean-you-ignore-the-obvious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/08/does-yagni-mean-you-ignore-the-obvious/</link>
	<description>For the betterment of the software craft...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:24:38 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Skorkin</title>
		<link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/08/does-yagni-mean-you-ignore-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-2677</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Skorkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 07:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=1101#comment-2677</guid>
		<description>Just checked out your post you provide a very sensible analysis, you&#039;re right definitely complementary :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just checked out your post you provide a very sensible analysis, you&#8217;re right definitely complementary :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/08/does-yagni-mean-you-ignore-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-2671</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=1101#comment-2671</guid>
		<description>Interesting post.  I agree 100%.

It&#039;s interesting that I just now stumbled upon this post, because I just got done writing a post with a somewhat complimentary point of view:  http://jasonsupdates.posterous.com/the-rise-of-sydni-or-yagni-is-only-about-prob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post.  I agree 100%.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that I just now stumbled upon this post, because I just got done writing a post with a somewhat complimentary point of view:  <a href="http://jasonsupdates.posterous.com/the-rise-of-sydni-or-yagni-is-only-about-prob" rel="nofollow">http://jasonsupdates.posterous.com/the-rise-of-sydni-or-yagni-is-only-about-prob</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Skorkin</title>
		<link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/08/does-yagni-mean-you-ignore-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-2371</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Skorkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=1101#comment-2371</guid>
		<description>It certainly does apply to KISS, I believe it applies to both equally well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly does apply to KISS, I believe it applies to both equally well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Sandberg</title>
		<link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/08/does-yagni-mean-you-ignore-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-2368</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Sandberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=1101#comment-2368</guid>
		<description>I agree, too. But I think your point rather applies to KISS than YAGNI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, too. But I think your point rather applies to KISS than YAGNI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YAGNI Prensibinin Püf Noktaları &#124; Bulutlararası</title>
		<link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/08/does-yagni-mean-you-ignore-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-2348</link>
		<dc:creator>YAGNI Prensibinin Püf Noktaları &#124; Bulutlararası</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=1101#comment-2348</guid>
		<description>[...] günü kurtarayım derken yarını berbat edebilirsiniz.  Alan Skorkin tarafından yazılan &#8220;Does YAGNI Mean You Ignore The Obvious&#8221; makalesi, işte tam noktada güzel tavsiyelerde bulunuyor. Detaylı bilgi isteyenlere [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] günü kurtarayım derken yarını berbat edebilirsiniz.  Alan Skorkin tarafından yazılan &#8220;Does YAGNI Mean You Ignore The Obvious&#8221; makalesi, işte tam noktada güzel tavsiyelerde bulunuyor. Detaylı bilgi isteyenlere [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murat Ozgur KAYMAKCI</title>
		<link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/08/does-yagni-mean-you-ignore-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-2323</link>
		<dc:creator>Murat Ozgur KAYMAKCI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=1101#comment-2323</guid>
		<description>very good point and very good article. YAGNI is like a knife, if you don&#039;t use it correctly, you can cut yourself :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good point and very good article. YAGNI is like a knife, if you don&#8217;t use it correctly, you can cut yourself :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Skorkin</title>
		<link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/08/does-yagni-mean-you-ignore-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-2306</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Skorkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=1101#comment-2306</guid>
		<description>I completely agree (it&#039;s like you read my mind :)). You have to supply yourself with as many tools as you can and then it is just a matter of using the right tool for the right job. The only thing to guard against is finding a favorite tool and using it for everything (the everything is a nail mentality).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree (it&#8217;s like you read my mind :)). You have to supply yourself with as many tools as you can and then it is just a matter of using the right tool for the right job. The only thing to guard against is finding a favorite tool and using it for everything (the everything is a nail mentality).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Stupidity Threshold &#124; Thought Clusters</title>
		<link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/08/does-yagni-mean-you-ignore-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-2305</link>
		<dc:creator>The Stupidity Threshold &#124; Thought Clusters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=1101#comment-2305</guid>
		<description>[...] Skorkin has a good post about how people tend to use concepts like YAGNI and TDD to justify whatever they are doing, instead of thinking about what they are doing: Every practice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Skorkin has a good post about how people tend to use concepts like YAGNI and TDD to justify whatever they are doing, instead of thinking about what they are doing: Every practice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/08/does-yagni-mean-you-ignore-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-2302</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=1101#comment-2302</guid>
		<description>I agree; principles, practices, methodologies, etc. are only good for helping you within their specific scope.  As soon as you try and retro-fit a practice to a problem that doesn&#039;t fit, you can end up failing.  Likewise, if you only learn and subscribe to a specific methodology and follow it blindly (just like YAGNI) then you rob yourself of the ability to solve problems creatively and effectively.  I think the best approach is to jam your brain full of this kind of good/helpful knowledge and learn to apply it where necessary and ignore it when it has no business influencing your project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree; principles, practices, methodologies, etc. are only good for helping you within their specific scope.  As soon as you try and retro-fit a practice to a problem that doesn&#8217;t fit, you can end up failing.  Likewise, if you only learn and subscribe to a specific methodology and follow it blindly (just like YAGNI) then you rob yourself of the ability to solve problems creatively and effectively.  I think the best approach is to jam your brain full of this kind of good/helpful knowledge and learn to apply it where necessary and ignore it when it has no business influencing your project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dew Drop &#8211; August 25, 2009 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</title>
		<link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/08/does-yagni-mean-you-ignore-the-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-2297</link>
		<dc:creator>Dew Drop &#8211; August 25, 2009 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=1101#comment-2297</guid>
		<description>[...] Does YAGNI Mean You Ignore The Obvious (Alan Skorkin) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does YAGNI Mean You Ignore The Obvious (Alan Skorkin) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
