<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Effective vs Ineffective Pair Programming</title> <atom:link href="http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/</link> <description>For the betterment of the software craft...</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:57:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator> <item><title>By: How to Thrive in Pairs &#171; Awkward Coder</title><link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-6122</link> <dc:creator>How to Thrive in Pairs &#171; Awkward Coder</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:03:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=816#comment-6122</guid> <description>[...] Alan Shorkin&#8217;s views on effective and ineffective pair programming &#8211; http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/ [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alan Shorkin&#8217;s views on effective and ineffective pair programming &#8211; <a
href="http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/" rel="nofollow">http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alan Skorkin</title><link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-3860</link> <dc:creator>Alan Skorkin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:52:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=816#comment-3860</guid> <description>Hi Chris,
Everyone has a preference when it comes to pair programming, although most people prefer to be hands on at least some of the time. It is important to make sure you both drive and navigate at least sometimes. Both of these train and require somewhat different skills.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p><p>Everyone has a preference when it comes to pair programming, although most people prefer to be hands on at least some of the time. It is important to make sure you both drive and navigate at least sometimes. Both of these train and require somewhat different skills.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Roane</title><link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-3857</link> <dc:creator>Chris Roane</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:39:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=816#comment-3857</guid> <description>This is very interesting. I have never heard of the term &quot;pair programming&quot; before. In fact, searching google didn&#039;t help either.
From my understanding, basically this is all about working as efficiently and effectively as possible in a programming environment. My background is from a php production web shop, and trying to get everyone to be on the same page in working with a specific system or specification is a major pain in the butt.
I have a hard time figuring out whether I am a driver or a navigator. I &quot;think&quot; I lean more towards being a navigator because it is all about being productive/profitable in my head and less about the specifics of the code.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting. I have never heard of the term &#8220;pair programming&#8221; before. In fact, searching google didn&#8217;t help either.</p><p>From my understanding, basically this is all about working as efficiently and effectively as possible in a programming environment. My background is from a php production web shop, and trying to get everyone to be on the same page in working with a specific system or specification is a major pain in the butt.</p><p>I have a hard time figuring out whether I am a driver or a navigator. I &#8220;think&#8221; I lean more towards being a navigator because it is all about being productive/profitable in my head and less about the specifics of the code.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Angel "Java" Lopez</title><link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-2169</link> <dc:creator>Angel "Java" Lopez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:33:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=816#comment-2169</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Tales from the Scrum: Cómo transferir conocimiento en un proyecto ágil...&lt;/strong&gt;
Ayer conocí, gracias a un mensaje del bueno de Jonathan Cisneros , autor del AjGenesis Studio , de este...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tales from the Scrum: Cómo transferir conocimiento en un proyecto ágil&#8230;</strong></p><p>Ayer conocí, gracias a un mensaje del bueno de Jonathan Cisneros , autor del AjGenesis Studio , de este&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alan Skorkin</title><link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-1993</link> <dc:creator>Alan Skorkin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:13:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=816#comment-1993</guid> <description>That&#039;s as good a description for it as any.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s as good a description for it as any.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Petros Amiridis</title><link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-1992</link> <dc:creator>Petros Amiridis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:40:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=816#comment-1992</guid> <description>Well, you can call it &quot;changing perspectives&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you can call it &#8220;changing perspectives&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Helltime for July 24 &#171; I Built His Cage</title><link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-1772</link> <dc:creator>Helltime for July 24 &#171; I Built His Cage</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:12:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=816#comment-1772</guid> <description>[...] am intrigued by pair programming, if not a little skeptical, so when Alan Skorkin highlighted effective vs. ineffective pair programming, I had to take a [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] am intrigued by pair programming, if not a little skeptical, so when Alan Skorkin highlighted effective vs. ineffective pair programming, I had to take a [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alan Skorkin</title><link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-1765</link> <dc:creator>Alan Skorkin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:44:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=816#comment-1765</guid> <description>True, however - when you&#039;ve been pair programming for a while you do start to notice that you&#039;re in a different frame of mind when you drive compared to when you navigate. Call it right brain vs left brain or call it whatever you like, but there is no doubting that the dichotomy exists.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, however &#8211; when you&#8217;ve been pair programming for a while you do start to notice that you&#8217;re in a different frame of mind when you drive compared to when you navigate. Call it right brain vs left brain or call it whatever you like, but there is no doubting that the dichotomy exists.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Turner</title><link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-1764</link> <dc:creator>John Turner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:18:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=816#comment-1764</guid> <description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateralization_of_brain_function#Pseudoscientific_exaggeration_of_the_research</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateralization_of_brain_function#Pseudoscientific_exaggeration_of_the_research" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateralization_of_brain_function#Pseudoscientific_exaggeration_of_the_research</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LATEST UPDATED BLOG &#187; Effective vs Ineffective Pair Programming</title><link>http://www.skorks.com/2009/07/effective-vs-ineffective-pair-programming/comment-page-1/#comment-1762</link> <dc:creator>LATEST UPDATED BLOG &#187; Effective vs Ineffective Pair Programming</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:06:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/?p=816#comment-1762</guid> <description>[...] the original: Effective vs Ineffective Pair Programming    Comments [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original: Effective vs Ineffective Pair Programming    Comments [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
