<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Why Teams Succeed And Why They Fail</title> <atom:link href="http://www.skorks.com/2008/09/why-teams-succeed-and-why-they-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.skorks.com/2008/09/why-teams-succeed-and-why-they-fail/</link> <description>For the betterment of the software craft...</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:57:06 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator> <item><title>By: The Logistician</title><link>http://www.skorks.com/2008/09/why-teams-succeed-and-why-they-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link> <dc:creator>The Logistician</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 21:24:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.skorks.com/2008/09/why-teams-succeed-and-why-they-fail/#comment-369</guid> <description>Interesting analysis.  Two quick thought:
I was in the military in the late 1960s - early 1070s.  We learned that the interests of the group were most important than the interests of individuals.  That has always stuck with me.
When I was an associate and partner in law firms for almost thirty years, I learned that clients are the firm&#039;s clients, not the individual&#039;s client.  We hammered home the practice that letters and documents should be signed on behalf of the firm, and not on the individual&#039;s behalf.
My point is that we can teach people to place their personal interests behind the interests of the whole.  And yet, I was a leader of my firm by sitting in the background, and
More recently, I learned that the Quaker religion conducts meetings, where the church members or Friends sit in a room and no one says anything for a while.  Eventually, a view or position emerges, and it is gradually modified or altered in phases, until it emerges as a consensus amongst the participants.  I found the process fascinating. You might visit the following, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quakers, especially the Section on Decision Making among Friends.
Thanks for contributing to the expansion of our minds and the realm of possibilities.
http://www.theviewfromoutsidemytinywindow.blogspot.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analysis.  Two quick thought:</p><p>I was in the military in the late 1960s &#8211; early 1070s.  We learned that the interests of the group were most important than the interests of individuals.  That has always stuck with me.</p><p>When I was an associate and partner in law firms for almost thirty years, I learned that clients are the firm&#8217;s clients, not the individual&#8217;s client.  We hammered home the practice that letters and documents should be signed on behalf of the firm, and not on the individual&#8217;s behalf.</p><p>My point is that we can teach people to place their personal interests behind the interests of the whole.  And yet, I was a leader of my firm by sitting in the background, and</p><p>More recently, I learned that the Quaker religion conducts meetings, where the church members or Friends sit in a room and no one says anything for a while.  Eventually, a view or position emerges, and it is gradually modified or altered in phases, until it emerges as a consensus amongst the participants.  I found the process fascinating. You might visit the following, <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quakers" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quakers</a>, especially the Section on Decision Making among Friends.</p><p>Thanks for contributing to the expansion of our minds and the realm of possibilities.</p><p><a
href="http://www.theviewfromoutsidemytinywindow.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.theviewfromoutsidemytinywindow.blogspot.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
